CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Mastr(20)
MCC 0.684 > 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.192 > 0.595 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.654 > 0.548
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 < 0.837
Total TP 123 > 103
Total TN 13070 < 13117
Total FP 61 > 26
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 5
Total FP INCONS 36 > 15
Total FP COMP 14 > 6
Total FN 65 < 85
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13070
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 13117
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 85
Total Scores
MCC 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.548
Positive Predictive Value 0.837
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.