CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.648 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.202 > 0.602 ± 0.280
Sensitivity 0.610 > 0.594
Positive Predictive Value 0.699 > 0.661
Total TP 114 > 111
Total TN 12448 > 12443
Total FP 60 < 72
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 17
Total FP INCONS 37 < 40
Total FP COMP 11 < 15
Total FN 73 < 76
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 114
Total TN 12448
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.202
Sensitivity 0.610
Positive Predictive Value 0.699
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 12443
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 76
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.280
Sensitivity 0.594
Positive Predictive Value 0.661
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.