CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.563 > 0.135
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.551 ± 0.188 > 0.065 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.596 > 0.035
Positive Predictive Value 0.544 > 0.538
Total TP 118 > 7
Total TN 13273 < 13477
Total FP 126 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 0
Total FP INCONS 78 > 6
Total FP COMP 27 > 19
Total FN 80 < 191
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 13273
Total FP 126
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.551 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.544
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3J16_L 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1136 12 4 7 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 13477
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 191
Total Scores
MCC 0.135
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.065 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.035
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.