CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.804 > 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.796 ± 0.099 > 0.636 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.745 > 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.875 > 0.674
Total TP 237 > 188
Total TN 15862 > 15854
Total FP 66 < 110
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 24
Total FP INCONS 20 < 67
Total FP COMP 32 > 19
Total FN 81 < 130
P-value 2.20167918023e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 237
Total TN 15862
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.804
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.796 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.745
Positive Predictive Value 0.875
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
3A2K_C 0.74 0.73 0.76 16 1087 6 1 4 1 6
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 6 2 2 2 6
3IVN_B 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 884 2 2 0 0 6
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 188
Total TN 15854
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 130
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1813 22 10 12 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.