CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) Alterna
MCC 0.828 > 0.757
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.808 ± 0.096 > 0.766 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.892 > 0.760
Total TP 446 > 440
Total TN 26596 > 26517
Total FP 119 < 202
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 36
Total FP INCONS 45 < 103
Total FP COMP 65 > 63
Total FN 129 < 135
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Alterna).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 446
Total TN 26596
Total FP 119
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 129
Total Scores
MCC 0.828
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.808 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.892
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 450 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 449 1 0 1 0 2
2KUU_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 430 2 0 1 1 2
2KUV_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 421 1 0 1 0 2
2KUW_A 0.78 0.72 0.87 13 455 3 0 2 1 5
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 369 2 0 2 0 16
2L1F_A 0.93 0.91 0.95 21 741 1 0 1 0 2
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 768 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.55 0.56 0.59 10 340 8 0 7 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2WWQ_V 0.70 0.68 0.72 13 1186 7 0 5 2 6
2XKV_B 0.78 0.82 0.75 9 1823 20 0 3 17 2
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.81 0.89 17 1110 3 0 2 1 4
2ZZM_B 0.81 0.67 1.00 10 1348 9 0 0 9 5
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 964 0 0 0 0 2
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 23 1475 4 0 2 2 7
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1139 2 0 0 2 1
3GX2_A 0.83 0.82 0.85 23 1422 7 2 2 3 5
3IVN_B 0.69 0.57 0.87 13 888 2 2 0 0 10
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3LA5_A 0.82 0.72 0.95 18 935 1 1 0 0 7
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 440
Total TN 26517
Total FP 202
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 103
Total FP COMP 63
Total FN 135
Total Scores
MCC 0.757
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.760
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 0.93 0.94 0.94 15 355 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2WWQ_V 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1185 5 0 0 5 0
2XKV_B 0.56 0.64 0.50 7 1821 27 0 7 20 4
2XQD_Y 0.73 0.71 0.75 15 1109 6 0 5 1 6
2ZZM_B 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 1342 21 3 11 7 13
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3AKZ_H 0.45 0.50 0.42 10 1103 16 6 8 2 10
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3GX2_A 0.56 0.57 0.57 16 1421 13 4 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 882 3 2 1 0 5
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 3 2 0 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1089 22 4 18 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13
3UZL_B 0.68 0.75 0.63 12 1274 13 4 3 6 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.