CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) Mastr(20)
MCC 0.783 > 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.063 > 0.615 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.743 > 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.829 < 0.849
Total TP 525 > 338
Total TN 74770 < 75005
Total FP 244 > 127
Total FP CONTRA 45 > 10
Total FP INCONS 63 > 50
Total FP COMP 136 > 67
Total FN 182 < 369
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 525
Total TN 74770
Total FP 244
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 136
Total FN 182
Total Scores
MCC 0.783
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.743
Positive Predictive Value 0.829
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.55 0.56 0.59 10 340 8 0 7 1 8
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.78 0.82 0.75 9 1823 20 0 3 17 2
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.81 0.89 17 1110 3 0 2 1 4
2XXA_G 0.74 0.69 0.80 24 2015 7 0 6 1 11
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3AMU_B 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1139 2 0 0 2 1
3GX2_A 0.83 0.82 0.85 23 1422 7 2 2 3 5
3IVN_B 0.69 0.57 0.87 13 888 2 2 0 0 10
3IZ4_A 0.73 0.64 0.82 61 25462 22 12 1 9 34
3IZF_C 0.84 0.83 0.85 29 2606 11 0 5 6 6
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 24 0 4 20 3
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 21 6 1 14 2
3LA5_A 0.82 0.72 0.95 18 935 1 1 0 0 7
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 26 2247 10 2 3 5 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 11 0 2 9 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 20 5 3 12 11
3PDR_A 0.87 0.88 0.86 44 4789 10 4 3 3 6
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 338
Total TN 75005
Total FP 127
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 369
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.615 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.849
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3A2K_C 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1088 3 0 3 0 5
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3GX2_A 0.46 0.39 0.55 11 1429 10 2 7 1 17
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25536 0 0 0 0 95
3IZF_C 0.91 0.91 0.91 32 2605 9 0 3 6 3
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 26 0 4 22 3
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.34 0.30 0.41 11 2251 18 1 15 2 26
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 12 0 2 10 2
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.