CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.679 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.272 > 0.582 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.620 > 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.752 > 0.608
Total TP 106 > 90
Total TN 12523 > 12516
Total FP 62 < 72
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 18
Total FP INCONS 28 < 40
Total FP COMP 27 > 14
Total FN 65 < 81
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 12523
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.272
Sensitivity 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 12516
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.608
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.