CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) Afold
MCC 0.642 > 0.627
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.183 < 0.679 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.478 < 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.868 > 0.611
Total TP 236 < 321
Total TN 61228 > 60975
Total FP 97 < 328
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 64
Total FP INCONS 31 < 140
Total FP COMP 61 < 124
Total FN 258 > 173
P-value 3.61352083003e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 236
Total TN 61228
Total FP 97
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 258
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.868
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3A2K_C 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1088 3 0 3 0 5
3G4S_9 0.68 0.62 0.76 16 2715 10 2 3 5 10
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25536 0 0 0 0 95
3IZF_C 0.91 0.91 0.91 32 2605 9 0 3 6 3
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 26 0 4 22 3
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.34 0.30 0.41 11 2251 18 1 15 2 26
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 12 0 2 10 2
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 321
Total TN 60975
Total FP 328
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 124
Total FN 173
Total Scores
MCC 0.627
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3G4S_9 0.73 0.69 0.78 18 2713 13 2 3 8 8
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 29 0 6 23 5
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.