CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.663 > 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.207 > 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.519 < 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.856 > 0.657
Total TP 125 < 140
Total TN 15496 > 15429
Total FP 28 < 88
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 19
Total FP INCONS 16 < 54
Total FP COMP 7 < 15
Total FN 116 > 101
P-value 1.3551590886e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 125
Total TN 15496
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 116
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.856
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 15429
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.657
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.