CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.674 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.255 > 0.465 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.548 > 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.837 > 0.475
Total TP 103 > 84
Total TN 13117 > 13063
Total FP 26 < 111
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 18
Total FP INCONS 15 < 75
Total FP COMP 6 < 18
Total FN 85 < 104
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 13117
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 85
Total Scores
MCC 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.548
Positive Predictive Value 0.837
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 84
Total TN 13063
Total FP 111
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.465 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.