CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MaxExpect & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MaxExpect Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.726 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.732 ± 0.126 > 0.619 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.736 > 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.725 < 0.872
Total TP 405 > 246
Total TN 37314 < 37591
Total FP 233 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 45 > 4
Total FP INCONS 109 > 32
Total FP COMP 79 > 13
Total FN 145 < 304
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MaxExpect and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 405
Total TN 37314
Total FP 233
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 109
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.726
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.732 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.736
Positive Predictive Value 0.725
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 452 2 0 1 1 1
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XXA_G 0.24 0.26 0.25 9 2009 28 1 26 1 26
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.55 0.83 0.37 10 4729 34 14 3 17 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 10 0 6 4 10
3O58_3 0.40 0.50 0.33 11 4731 36 8 14 14 11
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 3 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 10 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 246
Total TN 37591
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 304
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.872
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.67 0.56 0.83 10 455 2 0 2 0 8
2KUR_A 0.65 0.53 0.83 10 455 2 0 2 0 9
2KUU_A 0.67 0.56 0.83 10 435 2 0 2 0 8
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2L1F_B 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 771 2 0 2 0 6
2L1F_A 0.83 0.78 0.90 18 743 2 0 2 0 5
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 2 0 0 2 7
2XXA_G 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 2039 0 0 0 0 29
3GX2_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 14 1435 1 0 0 1 14
3IVN_B 0.62 0.52 0.75 12 887 4 2 2 0 11
3JYX_4 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 4753 4 0 0 4 9
3LA5_A 0.67 0.56 0.82 14 937 3 1 2 0 11
3NPB_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 13 2265 2 0 0 2 24
3O58_3 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 4758 1 0 0 1 16
3PDR_A 0.53 0.28 1.00 14 4826 0 0 0 0 36
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
4A1C_2 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4509 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.