CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold Cylofold
MCC 0.795 > 0.738
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.068 > 0.748 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.782 > 0.721
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.764
Total TP 855 > 788
Total TN 59326 < 59344
Total FP 285 < 330
Total FP CONTRA 60 < 65
Total FP INCONS 134 < 178
Total FP COMP 91 > 87
Total FN 238 < 305
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 855
Total TN 59326
Total FP 285
Total FP CONTRA 60
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 91
Total FN 238
Total Scores
MCC 0.795
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.782
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.75 0.83 0.68 19 1996 15 7 2 6 4
2KX8_A 0.93 0.94 0.94 15 355 1 0 1 0 1
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 2 0 0 2 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 1 0 0 1 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 1 0 0 1 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 2 0 0 2 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.55 0.55 0.55 16 2411 15 5 8 2 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 2 0 0 2 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.33 0.36 0.31 4 1822 27 2 7 18 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.27 0.26 0.30 9 2015 22 0 21 1 26
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 6 1 3 2 3
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 1 0 0 1 1
3AKZ_H 0.78 0.80 0.76 16 1106 7 2 3 2 4
3AM1_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 1437 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1141 4 0 1 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_h - 0.75 0.66 0.88 21 2116 3 0 3 0 11
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 2 8 0 10
3J0L_2 - 0.29 0.31 0.30 8 2223 21 1 18 2 18
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3NDB_M - 0.97 0.95 0.98 42 3671 5 0 1 4 2
3NKB_B - 0.42 0.42 0.44 8 717 10 2 8 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3O58_2 0.93 0.87 1.00 27 2727 2 0 0 2 4
3O58_3 0.30 0.36 0.25 8 4732 27 15 9 3 14
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.83 0.80 0.87 40 4794 9 2 4 3 10
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 2 0 0 2 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 1 4 0 5
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1256 2 0 0 2 2
3UZL_B 0.62 0.75 0.52 12 1270 17 8 3 6 4
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 788
Total TN 59344
Total FP 330
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 178
Total FP COMP 87
Total FN 305
Total Scores
MCC 0.738
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.721
Positive Predictive Value 0.764
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.56 0.55 0.57 16 2412 13 4 8 1 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J0L_h - 0.55 0.50 0.62 16 2114 10 2 8 0 16
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3NDB_M - 0.68 0.64 0.74 28 3676 14 2 8 4 16
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.45 0.50 0.42 8 1274 18 4 7 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.