CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.612 > 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.232 > 0.451 ± 0.258
Sensitivity 0.581 > 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.657 < 0.862
Total TP 140 > 100
Total TN 15429 < 15526
Total FP 88 > 22
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 2
Total FP INCONS 54 > 14
Total FP COMP 15 > 6
Total FN 101 < 141
P-value 0.000729039481942

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 15429
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.657
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 15526
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.451 ± 0.258
Sensitivity 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.862
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 357 0 0 0 0 18
2XXA_G 0.29 0.09 1.00 3 2042 0 0 0 0 32
3AMU_B 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1138 7 0 4 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.