CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) MCFold
MCC 0.616 > 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.264 > 0.579 ± 0.237
Sensitivity 0.585 < 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.660 > 0.536
Total TP 124 < 125
Total TN 14017 > 13972
Total FP 78 < 135
Total FP CONTRA 16 < 18
Total FP INCONS 48 < 90
Total FP COMP 14 < 27
Total FN 88 > 87
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 14017
Total FP 78
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.660
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 125
Total TN 13972
Total FP 135
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.237
Sensitivity 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.536
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G 0.23 0.26 0.24 9 2007 30 1 28 1 26
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.