CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.612 > 0.568
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.232 > 0.566 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.581 > 0.481
Positive Predictive Value 0.657 < 0.682
Total TP 140 > 116
Total TN 15429 < 15472
Total FP 88 > 65
Total FP CONTRA 19 = 19
Total FP INCONS 54 > 35
Total FP COMP 15 > 11
Total FN 101 < 125
P-value 3.79167477826e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 15429
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.657
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 15472
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 125
Total Scores
MCC 0.568
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.481
Positive Predictive Value 0.682
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.