CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Fold
MCC 0.683 > 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.495 > 0.633 ± 0.503
Sensitivity 0.636 = 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.750 > 0.688
Total TP 75 = 75
Total TN 4621 > 4612
Total FP 26 < 36
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 11
Total FP INCONS 18 < 23
Total FP COMP 1 < 2
Total FN 43 = 43
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 4621
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 43
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.495
Sensitivity 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.750
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 4612
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 43
Total Scores
MCC 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.503
Sensitivity 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.688
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.