CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.757 > 0.703
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.117 < 0.728 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.653 < 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.885 > 0.711
Total TP 231 < 249
Total TN 26064 > 25975
Total FP 49 < 136
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 31
Total FP INCONS 21 < 70
Total FP COMP 19 < 35
Total FN 123 > 105
P-value 1.80908287419e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 231
Total TN 26064
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 123
Total Scores
MCC 0.757
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.653
Positive Predictive Value 0.885
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.86 0.90 18 1109 3 0 2 1 3
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3AMU_B 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 1138 4 0 2 2 2
3IZF_C 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2609 5 0 2 3 6
3O58_2 1.00 1.00 1.00 31 2723 2 0 0 2 0
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 3 1 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 249
Total TN 25975
Total FP 136
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 105
Total Scores
MCC 0.703
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.711
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.