CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.594 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.303 < 0.598 ± 0.334
Sensitivity 0.500 < 0.543
Positive Predictive Value 0.716 > 0.589
Total TP 58 < 63
Total TN 9603 > 9577
Total FP 31 < 54
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 17
Total FP INCONS 18 < 27
Total FP COMP 8 < 10
Total FN 58 > 53
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 58
Total TN 9603
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 58
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.578 ± 0.303
Sensitivity 0.500
Positive Predictive Value 0.716
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15
4A1C_3 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 2738 4 0 3 1 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 63
Total TN 9577
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.334
Sensitivity 0.543
Positive Predictive Value 0.589
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.