CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.412 > 0.153
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.427 ± 0.199 > 0.084 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.506 > 0.045
Positive Predictive Value 0.350 < 0.538
Total TP 79 > 7
Total TN 11966 < 12179
Total FP 169 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 52 > 0
Total FP INCONS 95 > 6
Total FP COMP 22 > 19
Total FN 77 < 149
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 11966
Total FP 169
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 95
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.427 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.350
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J16_L 0.43 0.52 0.37 11 1129 19 8 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.41 0.56 0.31 9 1264 25 10 10 5 7
4A1C_3 0.58 0.68 0.51 25 2714 24 9 15 0 12
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 12179
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 149
Total Scores
MCC 0.153
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.084 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.045
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.