CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder RDfolder
MCC 0.626 > 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.745 ± 0.228 > 0.635 ± 0.340
Sensitivity 0.680 > 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.597 > 0.594
Total TP 83 > 60
Total TN 3980 < 4018
Total FP 60 > 42
Total FP CONTRA 15 > 6
Total FP INCONS 41 > 35
Total FP COMP 4 > 1
Total FN 39 < 62
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 3980
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.626
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.745 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.597
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.43 0.52 0.37 11 1129 19 8 11 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 60
Total TN 4018
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 62
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.340
Sensitivity 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.594
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.