CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for NanoFolder & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric NanoFolder Vsfold5
MCC 0.551 > 0.545
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.173 > 0.661 ± 0.200
Sensitivity 0.647 > 0.558
Positive Predictive Value 0.484 < 0.547
Total TP 183 > 158
Total TN 16676 < 16765
Total FP 225 > 151
Total FP CONTRA 73 > 32
Total FP INCONS 122 > 99
Total FP COMP 30 > 20
Total FN 100 < 125
P-value 0.0284778450094

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of NanoFolder and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Vsfold5).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for NanoFolder and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for NanoFolder and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of NanoFolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 183
Total TN 16676
Total FP 225
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 122
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 100
Total Scores
MCC 0.551
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.484
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.26 0.34 0.21 10 2392 41 15 23 3 19
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 2 0 0 2 1
3J16_L 0.43 0.52 0.37 11 1129 19 8 11 0 10
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.77 0.91 0.67 20 1246 12 6 4 2 2
3UZL_B 0.41 0.56 0.31 9 1264 25 10 10 5 7
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A1C_3 0.58 0.68 0.51 25 2714 24 9 15 0 12
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 158
Total TN 16765
Total FP 151
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 99
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 125
Total Scores
MCC 0.545
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.200
Sensitivity 0.558
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.31 0.31 0.32 9 2412 19 5 14 0 20
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.24 0.31 0.20 5 1268 20 9 11 0 11
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.