CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) ContextFold
MCC 0.747 > 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.357 > 0.668 ± 0.320
Sensitivity 0.707 > 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.796 > 0.771
Total TP 82 > 74
Total TN 9581 < 9588
Total FP 34 < 37
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 6
Total FP INCONS 19 > 16
Total FP COMP 13 < 15
Total FN 34 < 42
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 9581
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 34
Total Scores
MCC 0.747
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.357
Sensitivity 0.707
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 1 0 0 1 0
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 74
Total TN 9588
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 42
Total Scores
MCC 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.668 ± 0.320
Sensitivity 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.771
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.