Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
NanoFolder |
|---|
| MCC |
0.757 |
>
|
0.389 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.683
±
0.529
|
>
|
0.405
±
0.473
|
| Sensitivity |
0.733 |
>
|
0.475 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.787 |
>
|
0.331 |
| Total TP |
74 |
>
|
48 |
| Total TN |
9118 |
>
|
9067 |
| Total FP |
33 |
<
|
114 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
<
|
33 |
| Total FP INCONS |
18 |
<
|
64 |
| Total FP COMP |
13 |
<
|
17 |
| Total FN |
27 |
<
|
53 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and NanoFolder).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and NanoFolder).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
74 |
| Total TN |
9118 |
| Total FP |
33 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
18 |
| Total FP COMP |
13 |
| Total FN |
27 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.757 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.683
±
0.529
|
| Sensitivity |
0.733 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.787 |
| Nr of predictions |
4 |
Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
48 |
| Total TN |
9067 |
| Total FP |
114 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
33 |
| Total FP INCONS |
64 |
| Total FP COMP |
17 |
| Total FN |
53 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.389 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.405
±
0.473
|
| Sensitivity |
0.475 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.331 |
| Nr of predictions |
4 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
