Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of PknotsRG
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
PknotsRG |
|---|
| MCC |
0.747 |
>
|
0.672 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.683
±
0.357
|
<
|
0.719
±
0.421
|
| Sensitivity |
0.707 |
<
|
0.716 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.796 |
>
|
0.638 |
| Total TP |
82 |
<
|
83 |
| Total TN |
9581 |
>
|
9554 |
| Total FP |
34 |
<
|
63 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
<
|
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
19 |
<
|
31 |
| Total FP COMP |
13 |
<
|
16 |
| Total FN |
34 |
>
|
33 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and PknotsRG).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and PknotsRG).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
82 |
| Total TN |
9581 |
| Total FP |
34 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
19 |
| Total FP COMP |
13 |
| Total FN |
34 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.747 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.683
±
0.357
|
| Sensitivity |
0.707 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.796 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Performance of PknotsRG
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
83 |
| Total TN |
9554 |
| Total FP |
63 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
31 |
| Total FP COMP |
16 |
| Total FN |
33 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.672 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.719
±
0.421
|
| Sensitivity |
0.716 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.638 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
