Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of MCFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
MCFold |
|---|
| MCC |
0.808 |
>
|
0.546 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.738
±
0.247
|
>
|
0.524
±
0.274
|
| Sensitivity |
0.754 |
>
|
0.579 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.872 |
>
|
0.525 |
| Total TP |
95 |
>
|
73 |
| Total TN |
9825 |
>
|
9795 |
| Total FP |
30 |
<
|
91 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
<
|
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
11 |
<
|
50 |
| Total FP COMP |
16 |
<
|
25 |
| Total FN |
31 |
<
|
53 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MCFold).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MCFold).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
95 |
| Total TN |
9825 |
| Total FP |
30 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
11 |
| Total FP COMP |
16 |
| Total FN |
31 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.808 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.738
±
0.247
|
| Sensitivity |
0.754 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.872 |
| Nr of predictions |
6 |
Performance of MCFold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
73 |
| Total TN |
9795 |
| Total FP |
91 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
50 |
| Total FP COMP |
25 |
| Total FN |
53 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.546 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.524
±
0.274
|
| Sensitivity |
0.579 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.525 |
| Nr of predictions |
6 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
