CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.846 > 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.800 ± 0.202 > 0.427 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.795 > 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.905 > 0.350
Total TP 124 > 79
Total TN 12055 > 11966
Total FP 37 < 169
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 52
Total FP INCONS 11 < 95
Total FP COMP 24 > 22
Total FN 32 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 12055
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 32
Total Scores
MCC 0.846
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.800 ± 0.202
Sensitivity 0.795
Positive Predictive Value 0.905
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 11966
Total FP 169
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 95
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.412
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.427 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.350
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J16_L 0.43 0.52 0.37 11 1129 19 8 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.41 0.56 0.31 9 1264 25 10 10 5 7
4A1C_3 0.58 0.68 0.51 25 2714 24 9 15 0 12
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.