Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
NanoFolder |
| MCC |
0.846 |
>
|
0.412 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.800
±
0.202
|
>
|
0.427
±
0.199
|
| Sensitivity |
0.795 |
>
|
0.506 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.905 |
>
|
0.350 |
| Total TP |
124 |
>
|
79 |
| Total TN |
12055 |
>
|
11966 |
| Total FP |
37 |
<
|
169 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
<
|
52 |
| Total FP INCONS |
11 |
<
|
95 |
| Total FP COMP |
24 |
>
|
22 |
| Total FN |
32 |
<
|
77 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and NanoFolder).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and NanoFolder).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
124 |
| Total TN |
12055 |
| Total FP |
37 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
11 |
| Total FP COMP |
24 |
| Total FN |
32 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.846 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.800
±
0.202
|
| Sensitivity |
0.795 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.905 |
| Nr of predictions |
7 |
Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
79 |
| Total TN |
11966 |
| Total FP |
169 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
52 |
| Total FP INCONS |
95 |
| Total FP COMP |
22 |
| Total FN |
77 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.412 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.427
±
0.199
|
| Sensitivity |
0.506 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.350 |
| Nr of predictions |
7 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|