CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.828 > 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.178 > 0.536 ± 0.284
Sensitivity 0.772 > 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.892 > 0.524
Total TP 132 > 99
Total TN 12516 > 12475
Total FP 42 < 118
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 27
Total FP INCONS 13 < 63
Total FP COMP 26 < 28
Total FN 39 < 72
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 132
Total TN 12516
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.828
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.772
Positive Predictive Value 0.892
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 99
Total TN 12475
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.536 ± 0.284
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.524
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J16_L 0.42 0.48 0.38 10 1133 16 3 13 0 11
3UZL_B 0.92 1.00 0.84 16 1274 11 3 0 8 0
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.