CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.828 > 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.178 > 0.567 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.772 > 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.892 > 0.581
Total TP 132 > 100
Total TN 12516 > 12492
Total FP 42 < 97
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 19
Total FP INCONS 13 < 53
Total FP COMP 26 > 25
Total FN 39 < 71
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 132
Total TN 12516
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.828
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.772
Positive Predictive Value 0.892
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 12492
Total FP 97
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.567 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.581
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3J16_L 0.59 0.57 0.63 12 1140 7 0 7 0 9
3UZL_B 0.43 0.50 0.38 8 1272 17 4 9 4 8
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.