CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.828 > 0.401
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.178 > 0.439 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.772 > 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.892 > 0.427
Total TP 132 > 67
Total TN 12516 > 12507
Total FP 42 < 113
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 18
Total FP INCONS 13 < 72
Total FP COMP 26 > 23
Total FN 39 < 104
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 132
Total TN 12516
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.828
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.777 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.772
Positive Predictive Value 0.892
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 1 0 0 1 0
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 8 0 0 8 2
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 67
Total TN 12507
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.401
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.439 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.427
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.