CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.835 > 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.205 > 0.650 ± 0.308
Sensitivity 0.784 > 0.612
Positive Predictive Value 0.892 > 0.710
Total TP 91 > 71
Total TN 9582 < 9584
Total FP 28 < 41
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 9
Total FP INCONS 8 < 20
Total FP COMP 17 > 12
Total FN 25 < 45
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 9582
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 25
Total Scores
MCC 0.835
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.205
Sensitivity 0.784
Positive Predictive Value 0.892
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4A1C_3 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 2726 2 0 0 2 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 71
Total TN 9584
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 45
Total Scores
MCC 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.650 ± 0.308
Sensitivity 0.612
Positive Predictive Value 0.710
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.