CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.780 > 0.700
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.743 ± 0.170 > 0.721 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.714 > 0.699
Positive Predictive Value 0.860 > 0.709
Total TP 147 > 144
Total TN 13426 > 13394
Total FP 32 < 80
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 19
Total FP INCONS 21 < 40
Total FP COMP 8 < 21
Total FN 59 < 62
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 147
Total TN 13426
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.780
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.743 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.860
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 144
Total TN 13394
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 62
Total Scores
MCC 0.700
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.721 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.699
Positive Predictive Value 0.709
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.75 0.79 0.71 15 1136 9 0 6 3 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4A1C_3 0.81 0.81 0.81 30 2726 10 0 7 3 7
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.