CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.811 > 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.131 < 0.824 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.725 < 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.915 > 0.820
Total TP 108 < 114
Total TN 6200 > 6179
Total FP 14 < 30
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 6
Total FP INCONS 8 < 19
Total FP COMP 4 < 5
Total FN 41 > 35
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 6200
Total FP 14
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 41
Total Scores
MCC 0.811
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.725
Positive Predictive Value 0.915
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 114
Total TN 6179
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 35
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.824 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.820
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.