CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) MCFold
MCC 0.765 > 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.193 > 0.623 ± 0.250
Sensitivity 0.695 > 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.848 > 0.595
Total TP 123 > 116
Total TN 12015 > 11965
Total FP 28 < 105
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 17
Total FP INCONS 19 < 62
Total FP COMP 6 < 26
Total FN 54 < 61
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 12015
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 54
Total Scores
MCC 0.765
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.695
Positive Predictive Value 0.848
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 11965
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 62
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.623 ± 0.250
Sensitivity 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.595
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.