CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.811 > 0.548
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.131 > 0.548 ± 0.272
Sensitivity 0.725 > 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.915 > 0.643
Total TP 108 > 72
Total TN 6200 < 6206
Total FP 14 < 44
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 8
Total FP INCONS 8 < 32
Total FP COMP 4 = 4
Total FN 41 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 6200
Total FP 14
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 41
Total Scores
MCC 0.811
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.784 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.725
Positive Predictive Value 0.915
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 72
Total TN 6206
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.548
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.272
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.643
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.