CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.780 > 0.706
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.743 ± 0.170 > 0.709 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.714 > 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.860 > 0.718
Total TP 147 > 145
Total TN 13426 > 13395
Total FP 32 < 82
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 19
Total FP INCONS 21 < 38
Total FP COMP 8 < 25
Total FN 59 < 61
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 147
Total TN 13426
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.780
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.743 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.860
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.66 0.50 0.90 9 347 1 0 1 0 9
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4A1C_3 0.93 0.92 0.94 34 2727 2 0 2 0 3
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 145
Total TN 13395
Total FP 82
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.706
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.709 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.718
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.