CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.744 > 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.201 > 0.735 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.734 < 0.781
Total TP 157 > 143
Total TN 13383 < 13414
Total FP 77 > 56
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 11
Total FP INCONS 37 > 29
Total FP COMP 20 > 16
Total FN 49 < 63
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 157
Total TN 13383
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 49
Total Scores
MCC 0.744
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 43 11 20 12 15
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 8 0 5 3 6
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 13414
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 63
Total Scores
MCC 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.781
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.