CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Afold
MCC 0.737 > 0.725
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.792 ± 0.092 > 0.787 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.774 > 0.761
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.697
Total TP 764 > 751
Total TN 91515 < 91517
Total FP 425 < 435
Total FP CONTRA 115 > 113
Total FP INCONS 200 < 213
Total FP COMP 110 > 109
Total FN 223 < 236
P-value 2.28033735003e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 764
Total TN 91515
Total FP 425
Total FP CONTRA 115
Total FP INCONS 200
Total FP COMP 110
Total FN 223
Total Scores
MCC 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.792 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.774
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 141 1 0 1 0 1
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 2 0 0 2 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.89 0.86 0.93 25 2413 9 0 2 7 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G 0.25 0.26 0.26 9 2011 26 1 24 1 26
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 7 1 3 3 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.87 1.00 0.77 20 1101 9 6 0 3 0
3AM1_B - 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1434 7 3 4 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3IZF_C 0.90 0.91 0.89 32 2604 7 0 4 3 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_h - 0.89 0.88 0.90 28 2109 3 0 3 0 4
3NDB_M - 0.94 0.93 0.95 41 3671 8 0 2 6 3
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 207 11 6 3 2 3
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3O58_2 0.91 0.94 0.88 29 2721 10 0 4 6 2
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 1 0 0 1 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 1 0 0 1 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 751
Total TN 91517
Total FP 435
Total FP CONTRA 113
Total FP INCONS 213
Total FP COMP 109
Total FN 236
Total Scores
MCC 0.725
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.787 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.761
Positive Predictive Value 0.697
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 141 0 0 0 0 0
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 0.98 1.00 0.96 24 766 1 0 1 0 0
2L1F_A 0.98 1.00 0.96 23 739 1 0 1 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 8 0 0 8 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 197 2 0 1 1 2
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 8 1 3 4 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 16 6 9 1 8
3AKZ_H 0.19 0.20 0.21 4 1108 17 4 11 2 16
3AM1_B - 0.79 0.79 0.79 23 1437 6 0 6 0 6
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 1 14 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 5 1 1 3 6
3NDB_M - 1.00 1.00 1.00 44 3670 4 0 0 4 0
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 208 10 5 3 2 3
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3OVS_D - 0.82 0.83 0.83 10 204 2 0 2 0 2
3P22_G - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 301 1 0 1 0 1
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.