CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Cylofold
MCC 0.781 > 0.738
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.780 ± 0.078 > 0.751 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.804 > 0.722
Positive Predictive Value 0.767 > 0.764
Total TP 864 > 775
Total TN 57618 < 57731
Total FP 392 > 326
Total FP CONTRA 77 > 65
Total FP INCONS 186 > 174
Total FP COMP 129 > 87
Total FN 210 < 299
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Cylofold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 864
Total TN 57618
Total FP 392
Total FP CONTRA 77
Total FP INCONS 186
Total FP COMP 129
Total FN 210
Total Scores
MCC 0.781
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.780 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.804
Positive Predictive Value 0.767
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.82 0.87 0.77 20 1998 15 6 0 9 3
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 141 1 0 1 0 1
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 2 0 0 2 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.85 0.86 0.86 6 268 3 0 1 2 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.89 0.86 0.93 25 2413 9 0 2 7 4
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1108 2 0 0 2 0
2XXA_G 0.25 0.26 0.26 9 2011 26 1 24 1 26
2Y9C_V - 0.79 0.83 0.75 15 886 8 0 5 3 3
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 7 1 3 3 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.87 1.00 0.77 20 1101 9 6 0 3 0
3AM1_B - 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1434 7 3 4 0 4
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3IZF_C 0.90 0.91 0.89 32 2604 7 0 4 3 3
3J0L_2 - 0.30 0.31 0.31 8 2224 27 1 17 9 18
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.89 0.88 0.90 28 2109 3 0 3 0 4
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 1 4 2 2
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3J16_L 0.42 0.48 0.38 10 1133 16 3 13 0 11
3NDB_M - 0.94 0.93 0.95 41 3671 8 0 2 6 3
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 207 11 6 3 2 3
3O58_2 0.91 0.94 0.88 29 2721 10 0 4 6 2
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 2 0 0 2 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 1 0 0 1 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 1 0 0 1 0
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
3UZL_B 0.92 1.00 0.84 16 1274 11 3 0 8 0
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 775
Total TN 57731
Total FP 326
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 174
Total FP COMP 87
Total FN 299
Total Scores
MCC 0.738
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.751 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.722
Positive Predictive Value 0.764
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.56 0.55 0.57 16 2412 13 4 8 1 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_h - 0.55 0.50 0.62 16 2114 10 2 8 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3NDB_M - 0.68 0.64 0.74 28 3676 14 2 8 4 16
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.45 0.50 0.42 8 1274 18 4 7 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.