CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RDfolder
MCC 0.804 > 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.798 ± 0.088 > 0.706 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.826 > 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.793 > 0.738
Total TP 582 > 458
Total TN 25673 < 25786
Total FP 216 > 189
Total FP CONTRA 49 > 42
Total FP INCONS 103 < 121
Total FP COMP 64 > 26
Total FN 123 < 247
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 582
Total TN 25673
Total FP 216
Total FP CONTRA 49
Total FP INCONS 103
Total FP COMP 64
Total FN 123
Total Scores
MCC 0.804
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.798 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.826
Positive Predictive Value 0.793
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.87 0.88 0.88 7 141 1 0 1 0 1
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 2 0 0 2 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.85 0.86 0.86 6 268 3 0 1 2 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1108 2 0 0 2 0
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.79 0.83 0.75 15 886 8 0 5 3 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 7 1 3 3 3
3AKZ_H 0.87 1.00 0.77 20 1101 9 6 0 3 0
3AM1_B - 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1434 7 3 4 0 4
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 1 4 2 2
3J16_L 0.42 0.48 0.38 10 1133 16 3 13 0 11
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 207 11 6 3 2 3
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 2 0 0 2 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 1 0 0 1 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 1 0 0 1 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 458
Total TN 25786
Total FP 189
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 247
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.706 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.738
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 357 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 4 0 0 4 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 750 13 2 11 0 23
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1813 22 10 12 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.68 0.67 0.71 12 889 7 0 5 2 6
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
2YIE_X - 0.57 0.57 0.57 4 537 5 0 3 2 3
3AKZ_H 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1106 12 1 9 2 9
3AM1_B - 0.52 0.52 0.54 15 1438 13 4 9 0 14
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_8 - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 70 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 302 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 887 4 2 1 1 6
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 113 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.