CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RNAalifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RNAalifold(seed)
MCC 0.591 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.160 > 0.568 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.635 > 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.556 < 0.821
Total TP 338 > 224
Total TN 75260 < 75595
Total FP 357 > 67
Total FP CONTRA 103 > 22
Total FP INCONS 167 > 27
Total FP COMP 87 > 18
Total FN 194 < 308
P-value 0.0153885189249

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and RNAalifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RNAalifold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and RNAalifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RNAalifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 338
Total TN 75260
Total FP 357
Total FP CONTRA 103
Total FP INCONS 167
Total FP COMP 87
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.591
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.635
Positive Predictive Value 0.556
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XXA_G 0.25 0.26 0.26 9 2011 26 1 24 1 26
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 224
Total TN 75595
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 308
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.821
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 772 5 0 5 0 10
2L1F_A 0.68 0.61 0.78 14 745 4 0 4 0 9
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.80 0.64 1.00 7 1828 2 0 0 2 4
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.27 0.48 14 22411 19 13 2 4 37
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.26 0.81 25 25505 8 6 0 2 70
3NPB_A 0.77 0.59 1.00 22 2256 3 0 0 3 15
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.81 0.66 1.00 33 4807 1 0 0 1 17
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.