CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.560 > 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.174 > 0.073 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.526 > 0.041
Positive Predictive Value 0.608 > 0.538
Total TP 90 > 7
Total TN 12516 < 12651
Total FP 72 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 0
Total FP INCONS 40 > 6
Total FP COMP 14 < 19
Total FN 81 < 164
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 12516
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.608
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 12651
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.073 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.041
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.