CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RDfolder
MCC 0.642 > 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.186 > 0.593 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.587 > 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 > 0.621
Total TP 115 > 95
Total TN 6416 < 6422
Total FP 54 < 61
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 12
Total FP INCONS 34 < 46
Total FP COMP 10 > 3
Total FN 81 < 101
P-value 3.02344513449e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 6416
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 6422
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.621
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J0L_8 - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 70 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 113 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.