CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.560 > 0.131
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.174 > 0.130 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.526 > 0.070
Positive Predictive Value 0.608 > 0.267
Total TP 90 > 12
Total TN 12516 < 12619
Total FP 72 > 34
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 7
Total FP INCONS 40 > 26
Total FP COMP 14 > 1
Total FN 81 < 159
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 12516
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.608
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 12
Total TN 12619
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 159
Total Scores
MCC 0.131
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.130 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.070
Positive Predictive Value 0.267
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.