CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) IPknot
MCC 0.762 > 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.192 > 0.682 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.859 > 0.724
Total TP 128 > 123
Total TN 13091 > 13070
Total FP 39 < 61
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 11
Total FP INCONS 18 < 36
Total FP COMP 18 > 14
Total FN 60 < 65
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 13091
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13070
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.