CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.765 > 0.761
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.787 ± 0.078 > 0.767 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.671 < 0.727
Positive Predictive Value 0.875 > 0.800
Total TP 492 < 533
Total TN 77577 > 77473
Total FP 167 < 288
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 56
Total FP INCONS 36 < 77
Total FP COMP 97 < 155
Total FN 241 > 200
P-value 0.0347955950157

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 492
Total TN 77577
Total FP 167
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 97
Total FN 241
Total Scores
MCC 0.765
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.787 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.875
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 2 0 0 2 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.34 0.11 1.00 4 2041 0 0 0 0 31
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3G4S_9 0.73 0.54 1.00 14 2722 4 0 0 4 12
3GX2_A 0.88 0.79 1.00 22 1427 1 0 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.41 0.65 39 25476 26 15 6 5 56
3IZF_C 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2610 2 0 0 2 5
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.70 0.60 0.82 9 2367 14 0 2 12 6
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 26 10 2 14 2
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 2257 5 0 0 5 16
3O58_2 0.93 0.87 1.00 27 2727 5 0 0 5 4
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 5 1 2 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 533
Total TN 77473
Total FP 288
Total FP CONTRA 56
Total FP INCONS 77
Total FP COMP 155
Total FN 200
Total Scores
MCC 0.761
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.767 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.727
Positive Predictive Value 0.800
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2012 4 0 3 1 5
3A2K_C 0.74 0.73 0.76 16 1087 6 1 4 1 6
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3G4S_9 0.78 0.77 0.80 20 2711 16 2 3 11 6
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 6 2 2 2 6
3IVN_B 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 884 2 2 0 0 6
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.54 0.63 51 25455 35 18 12 5 44
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 12 0 5 7 4
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3JYX_3 0.73 0.73 0.73 11 2363 26 0 4 22 4
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 32 5 2 25 2
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 9 2 4 3 10
3O58_2 0.92 0.90 0.93 28 2724 13 0 2 11 3
3O58_3 0.62 0.59 0.65 13 4744 18 5 2 11 9
3PDR_A 0.85 0.82 0.89 41 4794 9 2 3 4 9
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.