CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.762 > 0.031
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.192 > 0.012 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.005
Positive Predictive Value 0.859 > 0.200
Total TP 128 > 1
Total TN 13091 < 13235
Total FP 39 > 23
Total FP CONTRA 3 > 0
Total FP INCONS 18 > 4
Total FP COMP 18 < 19
Total FN 60 < 187
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 13091
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1
Total TN 13235
Total FP 23
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 187
Total Scores
MCC 0.031
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.012 ± 0.029
Sensitivity 0.005
Positive Predictive Value 0.200
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.