CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.720 > 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.741 ± 0.221 > 0.733 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.709 > 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.737 < 0.782
Total TP 112 > 104
Total TN 17717 < 17736
Total FP 78 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 15
Total FP INCONS 22 > 14
Total FP COMP 38 > 20
Total FN 46 < 54
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 17717
Total FP 78
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 46
Total Scores
MCC 0.720
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.741 ± 0.221
Sensitivity 0.709
Positive Predictive Value 0.737
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 26 10 2 14 2
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 17736
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 54
Total Scores
MCC 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.782
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 13 6 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.