CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.762 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.192 > 0.465 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.859 > 0.475
Total TP 128 > 84
Total TN 13091 > 13063
Total FP 39 < 111
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 18
Total FP INCONS 18 < 75
Total FP COMP 18 = 18
Total FN 60 < 104
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 13091
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 84
Total TN 13063
Total FP 111
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.465 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.