CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.779 > 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.775 ± 0.172 > 0.735 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.704 > 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.868 > 0.781
Total TP 145 > 143
Total TN 13430 > 13414
Total FP 41 < 56
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 11
Total FP INCONS 19 < 29
Total FP COMP 19 > 16
Total FN 61 < 63
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 145
Total TN 13430
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.775 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.704
Positive Predictive Value 0.868
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 13414
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 63
Total Scores
MCC 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.781
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.