CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.760 > 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.191 > 0.723 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.679 < 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.858 > 0.749
Total TP 127 < 128
Total TN 12292 > 12269
Total FP 37 < 59
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 14
Total FP INCONS 18 < 29
Total FP COMP 16 = 16
Total FN 60 > 59
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 12292
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.679
Positive Predictive Value 0.858
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 12269
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.723 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.749
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.